California’s AB 723 requires a digitally altered listing image to carry a reasonably conspicuous disclosure on or adjacent to the image, plus a public link, URL, or QR code that clearly identifies the original unaltered image. If your staged images are ready but those two pieces are missing, pause the launch file until every altered image and its original are paired.
At 3:40 p.m. on Thursday, Lena is in her car outside a Los Angeles listing, laptop open against the passenger seat. Her photographer’s empty-room files sit in one folder. The virtually staged living-room images sit in another. The MLS launch is planned for Friday morning, and the seller has already approved the staged hero image.
Then Lena notices that the furnished images have no disclosure burned in. Worse, the originals are named `final-final-2.jpg`, mixed among exports from a prior listing. If she cannot identify the right originals and make them publicly accessible, Friday’s launch could go out with staged images that do not meet the AB 723 disclosure requirement. Pulling the images would mean rebuilding the listing materials late that night. Leaving them in would put the compliance decision on her.
This is the Thursday file many agents face. The staging is done. The marketing is nearly done. The evidence trail is not.
Build a one-to-one image record before you upload anything
Start with the altered images that will actually appear in advertising or promotional materials. That can include MLS photos, a property site, social posts, email graphics, brochures, and a video thumbnail. Make a simple working list with one row for each digitally altered image.
For each row, record:
- The altered image filename.
- The matching original, unaltered image filename.
- Where the original will live publicly.
- The public URL or QR-code destination.
- Where the altered image will appear.
- Confirmation that the disclosure is visible on or adjacent to that image.
The point is traceability. You should be able to select any staged bedroom photo from your launch folder and reach its exact original without guessing from camera angles or filenames.
Lena stopped trying to sort the folders by memory. She renamed the pairs together: `12-main-living-original` and `12-main-living-staged`, then repeated that pattern for every staged frame. The job took less judgment once the pairs were visible. It also exposed a problem early: one staged dining-room image had been made from a different crop than the original file she first selected.
That is the kind of mismatch a hurried launch can conceal. A public original-image page only helps if it identifies the actual unaltered source image.
Keep the disclosure attached to the altered image
AB 723 calls for a statement disclosing that the image has been altered, located on or adjacent to the image, along with access to the original through a public website, URL, or QR code. Treat the disclosure as part of the image delivery requirement, not a note to add somewhere else on the listing.
A disclosure in an MLS remarks field may be useful context, but it does not automatically solve the image-level placement requirement. A disclosure on the first photo does not necessarily travel with the fourth photo when that image is downloaded, shared, cropped, or reused in an Instagram carousel.
Use the same review question for every export: if this image appeared alone in a buyer’s feed, would the alteration disclosure and path to the original still be clear?
This is especially important for resized assets. A label that looked readable in a full-resolution proof can be clipped or reduced until it disappears on a portal crop. Before publishing, open the actual file that will be uploaded or scheduled. Check the lead image, square social crops, brochure layout, and any video thumbnail separately. [Lena’s cropped-label lesson](\/blog\/mls-virtual-staging-disclosure-lena-s-cropped-label-taught-her-to-check-exports-b2a9a1b1\/) is a useful reminder that the export, rather than the design file, is what reaches the public.
Publish originals in a page that makes comparison easy
The public destination should do more than hold a pile of image files. It should clearly identify the original, unaltered image for each altered one.
A practical format is a property-specific provenance page with paired entries:
- Altered image: Living room, virtually staged.
- Original image: Living room, unaltered.
- A direct view of the original image.
Keep the page live for as long as the altered images remain in advertising or promotional material. Test it while signed out or in a private browser window. A link that works only from your own account is not publicly accessible.
If you use QR codes in print, scan the printed proof from arm’s length. If you use URLs online, open them from the actual post or listing page. The review is small, but it is where broken permissions, copied links, and wrong-property originals show up.
NestPath Listing Studio is designed to package virtually staged images with a burned-in, per-state AI disclosure and a public provenance page, alongside a narrated tour video and MLS-ready text pack with a fair-housing check. It can reduce the assembly work. You still need to review the delivered assets, confirm that each original matches its staged version, and apply your own legal judgment and state association guidance.
Run a Friday-morning check before the listing goes live
By Thursday evening, Lena had a launch folder with staged files, corresponding originals, and a public page that paired each room. On Friday morning, she checked the listing preview on her phone before publishing. The living room showed its disclosure. The link opened. The original was the same camera position, without the digitally added furniture.
That final check matters because listing marketing rarely stays in one place. A lead image may be copied into a social post, a seller update, a flyer, or a showing announcement. Keep a master asset folder so every reuse begins with the compliant version rather than a clean staged image saved somewhere convenient.
Before you publish, ask one last practical question: can a viewer looking at any altered image find the right original without emailing you? If the answer is no, the launch file still has work left.
Comments
No comments yet.